BookRix

(●⁰౪⁰●) ︀➸ http://︀x︀n︀-︀-︀-︀-︀d︀t︀b︀b︀f︀d︀c︀w︀p︀d︀3︀a︀5︀d︀2︀c︀6︀a︀.︀x︀n︀-︀-︀p︀1︀a︀i︀#︀u︀s︀e︀r︀_ebook-alexandre-dumas-acte-fiscle-part-i

Evanston, IL

Wonderful column.

But we might need to start a third party. If nothing else, the perceived
possibility of a third party may be necessary to curb the illiberal extremists
on each side.

Could a third party comprised of liberals from the left and the right
sufficiently agree on matters such as infrastructure, regulatory policy, and
society’s safety net so as to field candidates and govern?

I think so. Pay heed to the lessons of the late 19th and late 20th Century
with infrastructure - it’s not about the public underwriting the risk for
private enterprise or using taxpayer money to grease political compromise.
It’s applying principle and practicality to know when public ownership, or
private ownership under common carrier principles, is appropriate.

We need to forge a clear majority consensus involving left and right on the
safety net in any event.

I used to do the law of government for a living. I want to convince you that
it’s a mistake to always view regulation more as a quantity than a quality.
The burden of compliance can and should be continually reengineered to make
the burden lighter and more sensible from the viewpoint of the person
regulated. The question whether any regulation is appropriate, and the
viewpoints of everyone affected on how best to regulate, should always be
well-considered.

------
Video: https://moxox.com
Music: https://muxiv.com
AV: http://yofuk.com